Thursday, January 31, 2013
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Tom- Hope All is Nice in California?
"a grand jury would 'indict a ham sandwich,' if that's what you wanted" New York State chief judge Sol WachtlerNASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) -- Some officials are expressing concerns about a new policy to post free digital recordings online of oral arguments from all of Tennessee's appeals courts.
the "Victim" of Stalking MUST be an INDIVIDUAL
Sharyn Bovat Was Jailed TWICE for Stalking/Harassment of NISSAN.
Bovat sent emails to executives telling them NOT to waste taxpayer money & to stop discriminating. Women in management at NISSAN went from 20.9% in 2006 down to 10% in 2009. www.NISSANWhistleblower.com
NISSAN Hired a Lawyer That Appeared at Grand Jury. The NISSAN head of corporate security testified against Sharyn - BUT NISSAN says they were "not involved".
Bovat Was NOT Allowed to Defend herself & NOBODY Told the Grand Jury that the Stalking code in Tennessee CLEARLY states that the victim is an INDIVIDUAL.
Bovat did NOT stalk NISSAN....
Twice the Charge was dropped.
Bovat lost credibility due to the charges. Sharyn Bovat was told in spring 2009 that NISSAN had 77 lawyers in Franklin. Yet Joe Baugh a former DA was hired from day 1 to "baby sit" the case. Why? If this was "truly" the actions of Just Terry Wood the ADA.
Judge Jeff Bivins let a faulty case continue & told Bovat he'd have her in jail for a year. Sharyn is 47 years old & has NEVER done anything wrong. She had a clean record. UNTIL the State of Tennessee let NISSAN "Swear Out" a Trespass charge & harassment charge. The trespass charge is "sketchy" Bovat was found guilty had to pay the "maximum" $50 fine - it's = to a speeding ticket. Still She claims she's innocent and says "educated people" know that she was railroaded. It's ALL about her blogging. Thank god Freedom of Speech is still allowed in America. NISSAN was trying to make Sharyn Bovat quiet... That is why her life has been hell. www.NISSANWhistlblower.com
Judge Robbie Beal quashed MOST of Bovat's Subpoenas.
Judge Time Easter Knowing that Bovat just lost her legal council for a valid reason did NOT give her time to prepare a defense at a Summary Judgment. Bovat's lawyer withdrew on January 14th.
January 28th he dismissed Bovat's malicious prosecution case based on: 1) Grand Jury Indictment = Probable Cause
2) Case was dropped on Technical Issue (yet that's how a case like this is DROPPED).
3) An affidavit from the Williamson County ADA Terry Wood - who took a case that he know would be overturned in an Appeals court to a Grand Jury. Terry Wood made false statements in reference to a pre-trial diversion that he says he offered Bovat. Worse he lied and Bovat proved that in a motion she filed with the court.
Matt Largen of Williamson County - Relocate Me OUT of Tennessee ...
mattlargen.blogspot.com/.../web-stats-show-williamson-county...Share
Jan 15, 2013 – From Jalopnik Article Oct. 5th, 2010 Williamson County ADA Terry Wood said Sharyn Bovat did not mention the Leaf prior to Oct 2010. That is ...
You +1'd this
Sharyn Bovat wants her reputation back and will take it to the SUPREME Court if needed: Educated people KNOW that Bovat was "wronged"
Those that know local politics and NISSAN's "close" relationship with the courts want Sharyn to fight to stop the Good Ole Boys. Too much bond debt to a foreign com pay that does NOT provide the jobs promised. A company that has taken federal money because in 2009 they had a "cash flow" problem. NISSAN marketing said it's to build a mass market EV - The NISSAN leaf is a flop. Just as Bovat blogged.
Jon Brancheau the VP of marketing "dodged" his subpoenas... Guess he didn't get the memo that the constitution is NOT a valid document in Tennessee. His was quashed. Brancheau connected with Bovat on Linkedin AFTER she was identified the #2 security threat for NISSAN. Who "connects" with the NISSAN Stalker? Why would the man that Terry Wood "repeatedly" says had he been at the trial would have said I stalked him.... Still Carlos Tavares (as of November 2012) uses my address for his COSTCO membership.
In court on monday I told the judge "David Letterman would not use his stalkers address for a COSTCO membership" he still sided with NISSAN.
The judge knowing my lawyer had to withdraw due to "Conflict of Interest" Google " Stephen Preston CIA" The court STILL did NOT give me time to prepare....
Judge Easter just let NISSAN "off the hook".... What do I do now? I know Appeal... but I need to work the stress is horrible. NISSAN is still abusing taxpayer money.
In court on monday I told the judge "David Letterman would not use his stalkers address for a COSTCO membership" he still sided with NISSAN.
The judge knowing my lawyer had to withdraw due to "Conflict of Interest" Google " Stephen Preston CIA" The court STILL did NOT give me time to prepare....
Judge Easter just let NISSAN "off the hook".... What do I do now? I know Appeal... but I need to work the stress is horrible. NISSAN is still abusing taxpayer money.
Also .... He never did an affidavit...saying Sharyn Bovat stalked him.
Thus those at NSSAN that were apart of "bad" real estate deals that hurt the average person in Franklin Tennessee. The city pays about 1 million in debt service - Just for the money they gave NISSAN. NISSAN has 3,950,000,000 in IDB Bond debt and another 2 Billion guarantee. When Carlos Ghosn "saved NISSAN" in the early 2000's ALL he did was "put the debt" on a credit card. NISSAN execs told me the subsidy Nissan North America is gonna go "bust" and America will not get back the 1.4 Billion tax dollars and those in Rutherford County will be liable. Bovat has stated on her blogs... if somethings NOT true call her and she'll CLARIFY. In reference to this issue ... SILENCE.
Appeals in Tennessee are Going to be ONLINE and Easily Available. Bovat was told hers could be one that gets LOTS of tweets. She has to learn how to "talk slow".... she will.People that care about the constitution know what happened to the NISSAN Whistleblower was wrong.
When shopping for a car - people will know that if they buy a NISSAN their supporting those that "abuse" power.
The Grand Jury Could NOT Read the Statue....
Historically, a grand jury indictment was used for determining whether to bring criminal charges in a number of common law countries. For example, England, Australia, and Canada all usedgrand juries during the twentieth century. In modern times, grand jury indictments occur primarily in the United States. Only some of the states, however, still use these indictments in prosecuting crimes. Grand jury indictments are also used in the United States if federal chargesare brought in a criminal case.
1)
By and large, grand juries decide whether enough evidence exists for a suspect to be taken to trial. Grand jury proceedings are usually required to be kept confidential. In most grand jury indictment proceedings, a prosecutor presents evidence in the form of witness testimony. As a general rule, the prosecutor can subpoena any potential witness to provide testimony without showing that the witness is likely to have relevant information about the crime. Certain types of witnesses, such as a spouse or the suspect’s criminal lawyer, can sometimes claim a specific privilege in order to avoid answering the prosecutor’s questions. |
Typically, the suspect and his or her criminal attorney are not present during the grand jurytestimony. As a result, they usually do not have the opportunity to present any conflicting evidence. If a suspect wishes to testify, however, a prosecutor may permit the testimony.
If the grand jury determines that the case may be brought to trial, they issue a “true bill” decision, and the suspect is formally charged with the alleged crime. A “no true bill” decision is issued when the jury decides insufficient evidence exists for a criminal trial. The grand juryindictment itself is usually drafted by the prosecutor and simply approved by the jury. If a grandjury fails to indict a suspect, a prosecutor may try to indict the suspect again, using a secondgrand jury, although this practice is uncommon.
Jurisdictions that no longer use grand jury indictments in charging a crime usually have a preliminary hearing. At the hearing, the prosecution presents evidence relating to the crime to acriminal law judge. The judge then determines whether sufficient evidence exists for trial.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Tom- Glad I Had a California Education - I Respect ALL People & Hate Racism
All I did was blog about NISSAN executives "wasting money".... evidently it "terrorized" NISSAN.
The problem was you can't STALK a corporation. The Williamson County ADA knew this - If not Terry Wood retarded. The code specifically states that it's an INDIVIDUAL.
For over Almost 3 years Sharyn Bovat has been discredited...& the courts helped.
Terry Wood had nothing to gain by having a Grand Jury indict a person for "stalking a corporation".... The law specifically says individual. On appeal it would be thrown out -
UNLESS he was acting as an "agent" for NISSAN. Terry Wood worked in California until 2007, is it true people from NISSAN helped get him his job?
NISSAN was able to draw down a 1.4 Billion dollar DOE loan. Nobody will say "how the money" was spent. NISSAN can't afford to pay the American taxpayers back. The collateral is a 2 Billion dollar Rutherford County IDB bond.
Can someone INVESTIGATE!!!!
2010 Tennessee Code
Title 39 - Criminal Offenses
Chapter 17 - Offenses Against Public Health, Safety and Welfare
Part 3 - Disorderly Conduct and Riots
39-17-315 - Stalking, aggravated stalking, and especially aggravated stalking.
39-17-315. Stalking, aggravated stalking, and especially aggravated stalking.
(a) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) “Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of two (2) or more separate noncontinuous acts evidencing a continuity of purpose;
(2) “Emotional distress” means significant mental suffering or distress that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling;
(3) “Harassment” means conduct directed toward a victim that includes, but is not limited to, repeated or continuing unconsented contact that would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress, and that actually causes the victim to suffer emotional distress. Harassment does not include constitutionally protected activity or conduct that serves a legitimate purpose; The first charged dropped by Judge Al Nations... He said my emails could be "annoying" still Mr. Tavares NEVER said anything.
(4) “Stalking” means a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another individual that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested, and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested; Again Mr. Tavares NEVER did an affidavit- He never complained. I keep telling people I was a "change agent"... the goal was to stop the discrimination and corruption by using my blog. a man from NISSAN IT helped me AFTER I started blogging and AFTER I was deemed the #2 Security Risk. Tavares/NISSAN did design a car to stop me from whining about "how UGLY" NISSAN cars were - The Ellure.
2011 Nissan Ellure concept made its world debut at the LA auto show on November 17th 2010.Marketed for women in their 30’s and 40’s who have are sophisticated and rebellious.
(5) “Unconsented contact” means any contact with another person that is initiated or continued without that person's consent, or in disregard of that person's expressed desire that the contact be avoided or discontinued. Unconsented contact includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(A) Following or appearing within the sight of that person;
(B) Approaching or confronting that person in a public place or on private property;
(C) Appearing at that person's workplace or residence;
(D) Entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, or occupied by that person;
(E) Contacting that person by telephone;
(F) Sending mail or electronic communications to that person; or
(G) Placing an object on, or delivering an object to, property owned, leased, or occupied by that person; and
(6) “Victim” means an individual who is the target of a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment. No INDIVIDUAL at NISSAN ever complained except Rob and I NEVER emailed him (or at least don't remember) NOBODY in management did an affidavit.- Still I was asked out on a date. WHY? Why did Mr. Tavares still use my address for his COSTCO membership? Cars were shown to me that were "not yet" on the market. WHY? Chris Haley from Vantech called me on July 7th 2011- Told me a NISSAN Motors Corporate Officer told him I was "the best." & that person gave him my #.
(b) (1) A person commits an offense who intentionally engages in stalking.
(2) Stalking is a Class A misdemeanor.
(c) (1) A person commits aggravated stalking who commits the offense of stalking as prohibited by subsection (b), and: For 19+ months I thought I was going to do 1 year in jail for something that I did NOT do- and a crime that does not exist. The stress was bad!!!
(A) In the course and furtherance of stalking, displays a deadly weapon;
(B) The victim of the offense was less than eighteen (18) years of age at any time during the person's course of conduct, and the person is five (5) or more years older than the victim;
(C) Has previously been convicted of stalking within seven (7) years of the instant offense;
(D) Makes a credible threat to the victim, the victim's child, sibling, spouse, parent or dependents with the intent to place any such person in reasonable fear of death or bodily injury; or
(E) At the time of the offense, was prohibited from making contact with the victim under a restraining order or injunction for protection, an order of protection, or any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward the victim or the victim's property, and the person knowingly violates the injunction, order or court-imposed prohibition. I guess they connected the "trumped up" trespassing to this... shows how things "snowball" out of control.
Hello Mr. Torlakson.... PLESSE Tell Your Students NOT to Move to Tennessee EVER.... Bill Hagerty and Will Alexander of the Tennessee ECD STOP the Corruption
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sharyn Bovat <sharynbovat@aol.com>Subject: Court Documents Filed By Baker Donelson Show Bovat Was Innocent of "Trumped Up" Stalking Charge - That Had Her Jailed 2 Times…. NISSAN VP Dodged Subpoena - It's Gets Worse.. Tennessee Courts Allowed Racketeering to Happen. PLEASE INVESTIGATE. I WIll Provide You With DocumentsDate: January 24, 2013 5:54:21 PM CSTTo: Blake Farmer <bfarmer@wpln.org>, "adam@tngop.org" <adam@tngop.org>, "jridley@nashvillescene.com" <jridley@nashvillescene.com>, "jrlind@nashvillepost.com" <jrlind@nashvillepost.com>, tn <mark@mpsbroadcasting.com>, Ken Marrero <BlueCollarMuse@gmail.com>, "csisk@tennessean.com" <csisk@tennessean.com>, "jadams@tennessean.com" <jadams@tennessean.com>, "jstroud@tennessean.com" <jstroud@tennessean.com>, "Bill.Hagerty@tn.gov" <Bill.Hagerty@tn.gov>, "breisinger@bizjournals.com" <breisinger@bizjournals.com>, "bobbie@tneagleforum.org" <bobbie@tneagleforum.org>, "Brent.Leatherwood@gmail.com" <Brent.Leatherwood@gmail.com>, "beverly.burger@franklintn.gov" <beverly.burger@franklintn.gov>, paul.chesser@atinstitute.org, Jonathan Collegio <jacollegio@americancrossroads.org>, Amelia Chasse <achasse@hynescommunications.com>, "mike.reynard@mail.house.gov" <mike.reynard@mail.house.gov>, Kathy Mcdonald <kathy.mcdonald@franklincenterhq.org>, "Will.Alexander@tn.gov" <Will.Alexander@tn.gov>, "matt@williamsonprospers.com" <matt@williamsonprospers.com>, "connie@brentwoodcoolsprings.org" <connie@brentwoodcoolsprings.org>, "matt@williamsonprospers.com" <matt@williamsonprospers.com>, "Will.Alexander@tn.gov" <Will.Alexander@tn.gov>, "4msilverman@gmail.com" <4msilverman@gmail.com>, "stockard@dnj.com" <stockard@dnj.com>, hsears@rutherfordchamber.orgCc: Sharyn❤ Bovat <sharynbovat@aol.com>
sorry for 3rd party speak... I'm doing a Press release. American need to Speak up about Crony Capitalism...Whistleblowers in America deserve RESPECT
The legal team discovered the 2nd and 3rd arrest were "pure" harassment. Sharyn's innocent on the Trespass charge.. they used a letter ordered by a man who "wasted taxpayer money and was scared I'd out him on my blog. Bovat "outed" him and then NISSAN arrested her.
The 2nd arrest was harassment on NISSAN's part. Bovat had asked her attorney to "sue" on that and he didn't he said he could sue on the 3rd arrest. That then allows NISSAN the opportunity to "get off the hook" because the 3rd arrest was from a Grand Jury indictment. Still it was NISSAN that hired Joe Baugh who handed over the emails.
The emails to Carlos Tavares were NOT illegal.He still uses my child's address for his costco membership too.The affidavit from Rob Trayham states that he handed her a letter in April or May 2009. That is NOT true - he handed her a letter in July 2009. Bovat did receive 2 Fedex packages in June telling her to take her blog down. That violated her "freedom of speech" Also Mr. Tavares kept emailing- He was PRESIDENT of NISSAN North America and on the board of NISSAN Motors. Sharyn until Feb. 2010.The charges the 2nd time were "trumped up".... there is NO justification for the Williamson Count DA to even see the emails. The bond order the Bovat signed was just to "stay away from NISSAN" never mentions her not contacting anyone. It does not say she cannot email. In fact - Bovat's attorney did NOT catch this... or maybe he did? The DA did not catch this....or maybe they did? Joe Baugh did not catch this... or maybe he did? Bovat will submit a motion that shows that NISSAN is JUSTIFIABLY responsible for her malicious prosecution. She will add the State of Tennessee and is mulling over adding her "ex" attorney.
The ONLY concern Bovat has is she had a sporadic Bimbo encounter in the early 90's with a member of congress whom she might reach out to for help. Since I told Kline Preston in an email his name if she Added him to the lawsuit it would allow that ALL communication with Kline Preston be available. That is the ONLY thing she fears getting out otherwise any other communication is fine.
Because I've been terrorized I put EVERYTHING on the blog. Adding Kline Preston to the malicious prosecution by putting it in a motion would make it public. As I write this I could feel the "wrongness" in putting that man whose a member of the Christian Coalition through publicly being "outed" as an adulterer. Even hypocrites deserve RESPECT!!! Therefore I will simply proceed with a different avenue against my "ex".... lawyer. I might have the "California Morals" that some in Tennessee say makes me a sinner-still when it comes to protecting the taxpayer-Ya'll I'm a ****ing saintIt looks like what I was told was RIGHT. Maybe soon people at the Brentwood Baptist Church will be praying for the Good Ole Boys doing time for racketeering. Mark Stout - Joe Baugh- Scott Becker- Tracy Woodard- Jon Brancheau & others Federal time is 85% served.MR. Tavares emailed me after I sent him this.... Others knew too. ONLY after did I find out that NISSAN was using outdating technology and there was NO WAY the car could be a success did I blog against it. I originally "thought" just the Good Ole Boys (supporters of Haley Barbour) did not want it to succeed. I was to "The failed EV will be Haley Barbour's ticket to the White House."..... it looks like it was also Al Gores ticket to becoming Richer than Romney. Haley Barbour did deals with NISSAN. Sorry- but I have proof Barbour wanted me "silent"...it's circumstantial but based on my web stats it's probable cause... Guess we know Why the former RNC Chairman gave to the Obama Inauguration. He wants to keep the DOJ off his back. If someone know someone that knows Haley Barbour... Tell them to make a call to NISSAN. It's time to mediate a quiet solution. What happened to me is WRONG.
Thank you,
Sharyn Bovat
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Tom Torlakson - Update
Sharyn Bovat sent her now "ex" lawyer a certified letter on January 3rd to confirm he had issued subpoenas. Good thing she did. The client file shows Kline did nothing. He issued the Subpoenas on the 13th - ONLY after the certified letter. Bovat had told him for OVER a year who she wanted to testify. Kline Preston is a smart man - Bovat believed in him UNTIL he texted her that Stephen Preston was her Brother. Sharyn was treated unfairly in the courts. NISSAN had an economic motive. In reference to Kline Preston one must ask the question WHY? Marsha Blackburn might have that answer if not there's always the CIA.
The Security Tape Bovat Repeatedly Asked for is NOT in the Client File. All Bovat can see is a discovery form dated December 2010. Bovat did send Mr. Preston ANOTHER certified letter on in November specifically about the discovery. Bovat will be able to prove that Mr. Preston repeatedly told her "he had everything under control"... He even yelled at her one time for no trusting him. All that will be proved soon- when i ask for a retrial of the misdemeanor = to a speeding ticket.
Sharyn Bovat is NOW Going to Ask for the copy of the security tape again for the civil malicious prosecution trial. Another Motion.... This is Not Justice American Style.
Prior to trial Bovat gor a call that Kline Preston was working against her. She wanted to believe the best in him. He was the Treasurer for Marsha Blackburn and he was currently the President of Marsha Blackburn Inc. Bovat has suffered IRS retaliation and it was Blackburn's office that intervened. YES!! NISSAN did not do Bovat's tax forms correctly and made the relocation expenses of Carlos Tavares "income" Bovat was going to have to pay $1500 in taxes for money reimbursed to her- the expenses were a washer dryer, Comcast set up, a satellite dish... Mr. Tavares did not have an American social security # - she did not want to have his private credit card # so Bovat was told by NISSAN HR to use her credit card & she'd be reimbursed. After she whistle blew the 1099 was done incorrectly. Sharyn called and asked for a revision and NISSAN refused. Copies of corresponded will be put in a new motion showing the abuse of the whistle blower. An amendment to the compliant will be filed shortly.
Sharyn Bovat: Sunday January 20th went through her official client profile given to her by Kline Preston. The documents show that Bovat sent Mr. Preston certified letters to ensure he would file the subpoenas. A blank pre trial diversion was in the back of the file and it was not filled out. This could have been the form that Bovat was asked o sign without viewing. Bovat will take a lie detector test if needed to prove the statement by Williamson ADA Terry Wood is false. She was not offered this. In fact if this is what Mr. Preston was talking to Bovat about in March 2011 then Bovat sees the need for the TBI to investigate. Bovat was put on the docket 1st that day. Mr. Wood never spoke to her about it and she never got to see the document. Bovat has touched the document briefly today but would be happy to hand it over to a lab to be tested for finger prints. Sharyn was told racketeering happened. It's about Federal money , state money , NISSAN executives cutting deals , land deals, the reason why higher level NISSAN executives allowed this to happen is "most likely" they were protecting the CEO Carlos Ghosn. His involvement with ex CIA he met at Michelin and were connected to the cover up of the Lockerbie crash
Bovat has filed a rejections of Summery judgement and list 4 reasons. It mentions Lockerbie, Dept. of Energy Fraud, Good Ole Boy Networks, discrimination & more.
Please go to the Williamson County courthouse in Tennessee and reviews.
America should be about honoring the Constitution and for Respect for ALL people.
Thank you
Sharyn Bovat
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Tom Torlakson - Do You Like Sweet Tea?
On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Sharyn Bovat <sharynbovat@aol.com> wrote:
Just told some good news.... Maybe I'll get to move soon to the East coast- When I'm gone YOU people in Tennessee are gonna miss me-right?Before I go thought I'd try to help the schools in Tennessee... Remember the show "Wife Swap" how about School Superintendent Swap?
The man from the state with the "don't say gay bill" (that might jail/fire a teacher for mentioning the word) vs. the guy from the state that encourages the celebrations of Harvey Milk Day... This would be "stellar TV"...OMG- Lockerbie Families Might Really get the truth.... Al Gores Internet is quite the invention :):) Sharyn
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)